
I haven't posted one of my Date, Time, Place photographs yet, but this was all that I was required to shoot today since my game and track meet were both rained out.
Date, Time, Place, for those of you who don't know, is a weekly photograph that we publish along with a calendar and briefs in the Sunday Living section. It was conceived of many years ago when it was decided that it would be nice to have a photograph to break up a page of gray text. And it is nice. At the time, former
Times photographer
Phillip Walrod wanted a place to publish the more artsy photos that he tended to take and this seemed like a perfect solution for both needs. Another former
Times photographer,
Robbie Hammer, embraced DTP and it quickly became a favorite among our readers.
Along with the photo are printed the day, time and place where the photograph was made. Though each photographer who contribute to DTP make it his or her own to define, the photos tend to be somewhat enigmatic, and taken in the spirit of making a visually interesting photo that by its nature would have no other place in the newspaper. And I think in its creation there was the assumption that every photographer needs this sort of outlet.
At the same time of the creation of DTP was the creation of a spot similar in duties, but on the agate page in sports. This gave me an outlet to use all of the photos that I shot at practices and games and allowed me to publish the scores of photos — sometimes of support staff who would not otherwise be published in a photograph — that we would not otherwise have the opportunity or need to print. When we lost the use of the Associated Press wire, we also lost the agate page and the photograph that went on it daily.
Not since I was very young have I found myself taking photos that lack a sense of newsworthiness. I've been shooting for an editor and a publication since 1988, and that sense of purpose shapes my work and my curiosity completely. I no longer shoot out of a sense of whimsy, but instead shoot for an audience, an editor and a publication in mind. And I think the current staff at the
Times feels the same way.
The result is a sort of reluctance to fill what should be the most fun spot in the paper. Weird.